Most people pick one AI and use it for everything. That's the wrong frame. It's like hiring one person to write your emails, fact-check vendor claims, design your slides, and review your contracts. They might be good at one of those. They are not good at all four. The skill nobody has yet is knowing who to put on which job.
You'll know who's on the team, what each one is actually good at, and which of them is worth $20 a month to you.
Most everything else is marketing. Hold these loosely. You'll see them again on the candidate cards.
Tap any card to read the file. Real strengths, real weak spots. No spec sheets.
"Hand me the messy email. I'll get the tone right."
"What do you need? I can probably do it."
"Don't take my word for it. Here are the sources."
"I'm already inside your Gmail. Just tell me what you need."
No revealed answers until you've assigned all four. Trust your gut.
"Draft a difficult email to a client telling them we'll miss the deadline by a week."
"Fact-check a competitor's pricing claim before I cite it in a proposal tomorrow."
"Summarize this 40-page vendor contract and flag anything unusual."
"Make a quick image for a LinkedIn post about my new service offering."
Match the candidate to the job.
Don't pick one for everything.
Each one has a $20 plan, with higher tiers above that. Mostly it buys a smarter model, more messages, and better tools. The free tiers exist so you can test them side by side. Pick the one closest to your week, run it for a month, then try the others on the side.
This roster will look different in six months. Models keep getting better, and the gaps between them keep shrinking. For most everyday work, all four are good enough. The smart move is knowing the differences, not chasing whoever's in the lead that week.